Prateek Sharma And ORS. v. State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi) And ANR.

$~105 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4086/2026 PRATEEK SHARMA AND ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr.

Abhinav Rathi, Mr.

Suraj Goliyan, Ms. Sakshi Tomar, Mr.

Manvendra Singh and Ms. Priyanka Sharma, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR......Respondents Through:

Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with SI Balwant Singh.

Mr. Shivam Sharma and Ms. Tanisha Arora, Advocates for R-2 with R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 21.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 16535/2026 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 4086/2026 3.

By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR bearing No. 06/2019, registered at Police Station CAW Cell Nanakpura, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC') and all consequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

arrived at between the parties.

4.

Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. 5.

All the petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned, Police Station CAW Cell Nanakpura, Delhi. 6.

Brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner no. 1 and the respondent no. 2 was solemnized at Delhi on 29.01.2015, in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies. It is stated that no child was born out of the said wedlock. It is stated that due to various differences, disputes and issues had arisen between the petitioners and the respondent no.

2. Upon the complaint by respondent no. 2, the present FIR came to be registered against the petitioners. It is stated that with intervention of the family and friends, the parties have now amicably settled their dispute vide Settlement Agreement dated 07.07.2025.

7.

On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is stated that she has already received the amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- vide Demand Draft (DD) bearing no. 000569 dated 11.05.2026 drawn on Bank of India, Shahdra Branch, New Delhi. Therefore, she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

8.

In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 9.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 06/2019, registered at Police Station CAW Cell Nanakpura, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

10.

The petition stands disposed of.

11.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MAY 21, 2026/vc The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.