Nayeem Ahmad Khan v. National Investigation Agency

$~53 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 478/2023 & CRL.M.A. 16265/2023 NAYEEM AHMAD KHAN .....Appellant Through:

Ms. Tara Narula, Adv.

versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.

with Mr. Akshai Malik, Mr.

Ayush Agarwal, Mr. Karl P.

Rustom, Mr.

Udbhav Sinha, Mr. Siddharth Sinha and Mr.

Yatharth Sharma, Advs.

Mr. B.B. Pathak, DSP and Mr.

Abhishek Kumar, DSP

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

O R D E R

% 19.12.2024 1.

The learned counsel for the appellant concedes to the objection of the respondent that the present appeal, insofar as it challenges the Order dated 27.01.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03 (Special Judge), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, attaching the immovable properties of the appellant herein, would be an interlocutory order and therefore, the appeal would not be maintainable.

2.

Though the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present appeal be treated as a petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 06:30:55

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, we are of the opinion that the present appeal be disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to the appellant to avail of his remedies in accordance with law. 3.

The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as above.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J SHALINDER KAUR, J DECEMBER 19, 2024 SU/SK/as Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 06:30:55