Arup Majee v. Directorate Of Enforcement

$~20 to 29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

(20) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 41/2026

(21) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 42/2026 (22)+ MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 43/2026

(23) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 44/2026

(24) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 45/2026

(25) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 46/2026

(26) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 47/2026

(27) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 48/2026

(28) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 49/2026

(29) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 50/2026 SMT SUMITA MAJEE .....Appellant ANUP MAJEE .....Appellant ARUP MAJEE .....Appellant SMT BANDANA PATTANAYAK .....Appellant ASHOK PATTANAYAK .....Appellant SHRI JOY MAJEE .....Appellant M/S ISPAT DAMODAR PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant SMT RUPALI MAJEE .....Appellant SHRI ANUP MAJEE .....Appellant MS SONIC THERMAL PVT LTD .....Appellant Through:

Mr.Sumer Singh Boparai, Mr.Sirhaan Seth, Mr.Abhilash Kr. Pathak, Mr.Surya Pratap Singh, Mr.Suvranil Saha, Advs.

versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Anupam S. Sharrma, (SC ED), Ms. Harpreet Kalsi, Mr.

Vashishth Rao, Mr. Abhiyant Singh, Ms. Amisha P. Dash, Ms. Pragati Ojha, Mr. Mayank Tyagi, Ms. Pragya Nath, Advs.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

O R D E R

% 26.05.2026 CM APPL. 35461/2026 in MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 41/2026 CM APPL. 35478/2026 in MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 42/2026 CM APPL. 35480/2026 in MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 43/2026 CM APPL. 35482/2026 in MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 44/2026 CM APPL. 35484/2026 in MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 45/2026 CM APPL. 35486/2026 in MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 46/2026 CM APPL. 35597/2026 in MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 47/2026 CM APPL. 35599/2026 in MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 48/2026 CM APPL. 35601/2026 in MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 49/2026 CM APPL. 35612/2026 in MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 50/2026 1.

For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in filing the appeals is condoned.

2.

The applications are disposed of.

MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 41/2026 & CM APPL. 35460/2026 MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 42/2026 & CM APPL. 35477/2026 MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 43/2026 & CM APPL. 35479/2026 MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 44/2026 & CM APPL. 35481/2026 MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 45/2026 & CM APPL. 35483/2026 MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 46/2026 & CM APPL. 35485/2026 MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 47/2026 & CM APPL. 35596/2026 MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 48/2026 & CM APPL. 35598/2026 MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 49/2026 & CM APPL. 35600/2026 MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 50/2026 & CM APPL. 35611/2026 3.

The learned counsel for the appellant(s), in view of the objection of lack of territorial jurisdiction in this Court, prays for leave to withdraw these appeals with liberty to file them before the Court of competent jurisdiction.

4.

As far as the objection of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

1963 is concerned, the appellant(s) is given liberty to agitate the same before the competent Court.

5.

The appeals and the pending applications are accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J MAY 26, 2026/Arya/as The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.