← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./1751/2021

Sugandha Agarwal v. State G.N.C.T. Of Delhi & ANR.

2025-04-08Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna2 pages

$~8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1751/2021, CRL.M.A. 1171/2022, CRL.M.A. 20776/2022, CRL.M.A. 25539/2022 X .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Nandita Rao, Senior Advocate with Ms. Jagriti Singh, Msd. Mamta Shah, Ms. Prerna Singh, M.r Amit Peswani and Mr. Ankur Raghav, Advocates.

versus STATE G.N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondent Through:

Mr. Shoaib Haider, Ld. APP for the State with SI Udai Singh P.S. Saket.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr.

Advocate with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Mr. Dhruv Chaudhry, Ms. Pallavi Garg, Mr. Anirudh Tanwar and Mr.

Shubham Sourav, Advocates for R-2 in person.

+ CRL.M.C. 1968/2022, CRL.M.A. 8373/2022, CRL.M.A. 16847/2022, CRL.M.A. 20703/2022, CRL.M.A. 14264/2023 S .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Nandita Rao, Senior Advocate with Ms. Jagriti Singh, Msd. Mamta Shah, Ms. Prerna Singh, M.r Amit Peswani and Mr. Ankur Raghav, Advocates.

versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:44:16

.....Respondent Through:

Mr. Shoaib Haider, Ld. APP for the State with SI Udai Singh P.S. Saket.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr.

Advocate with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Mr. Dhruv Chaudhry, Ms. Pallavi Garg, Mr. Anirudh Tanwar and Mr.

Shubham Sourav, Advocates for R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 08.04.2025 1.

Petitions under Section 439(2) read with Section 482 Cr.P.C have been filed on behalf of the Petitioners for cancellation of Anticipatory Bail granted to Respondent No.2 vide Order dated 22.06.2021 in FIR No.176/2021 under Section 376/451/341/313/354/506/509/34 IPC Police Station Saket.

2.

It is submitted that the Charge Sheet already stands filed and the Prosecution is adducing its evidence.

3.

Without prejudice to the rights and contentions learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioners on instructions submits that she is not pressing of these two Petitions at this stage and seeks permission to withdraw the same.

4.

In view of the submissions made the above two Petitions are permitted to be withdrawn.

5.

The Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J APRIL 8, 2025/va The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:44:16