Pinky Tripathi v. State (NCT Of Delhi) And ORS

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7833/2021, CM APPL. 24380/2021 & 30421/2022 PINKY TRIPATHI ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Adv. for R1.

Mr. Navin Kumar and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Bidhuri, Advs. for R3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

O R D E R

% 10.04.2024 1.

None appears for the petitioner.

2.

Vide order dated 19.09.2023 it has been directed as under:- "1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is taken up for hearing.

2. I noticed that there has been no appearance recorded for the petitioner since 13.08.2021.

3. The Registry is directed to issue Court notice to learned counsel for the petitioner at the address mentioned in the memo of parties.

4. If the petitioner remains unrepresented on the next date of hearing, it may be presumed that she does not wish to prosecute the petition further.

5. List on 06.12.2023."

3.

Even thereafter, on 06.12.2023, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.

4.

In view of the non-appearance of the petitioner, the present petition, alongwith all the pending applications, stands dismissed in default for nonprosecution. SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 10, 2024/at The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:08:20