← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/1471/2021

Raj Kumar v. State NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

2025-03-12Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna3 pages

$~42 to 47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1471/2021 with CRL.M.A. Nos. 12315/2021, 16676/2021, 12944/2023, 22502/2023, 25121/2023, 26433/2023, 29026/2023, 34083/2023, 3238/2024 and 14241/2024 RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:

Advocate (appearance not given)

Versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs.

Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates + W.P.(CRL) 1472/2021 with CRL.M.A. 12317/2021 GS MIGLANI .....Petitioner Through:

Advocate (appearance not given)

Versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs.

Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr.

Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates.

Mr. A S Sirohi, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.

+ W.P.(CRL) 1473/2021 with CRL.M.A. 12319/2021 DEWAN RABINDRANATH SONI .....Petitioner Through:

Advocate (appearance not given)

Versus

STATE & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs.

Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr.

Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates.

Mr. A S Sirohi, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.

+ W.P.(CRL) 1474/2021 with CRL.M.A. 12321/2021 B.S. RANDHAWA .....Petitioner Through:

Advocate (appearance not given) The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Versus

STATE(NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs.

Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr.

Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates.

Mr. A S Sirohi, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.

+ W.P.(CRL) 1475/2021 with CRL.M.A. 12323/2021 MANDEEP KAPUR .....Petitioner Through:

Advocate (appearance not given)

Versus

STATE(NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs.

Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr.

Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates.

Mr. A S Sirohi, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.

+ W.P.(CRL) 1476/2021 and CRL.M.A. 12325/2021 VIKRAM KAPUR .....Petitioner Through:

Advocate (appearance not given)

Versus

STATE AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mrs.

Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou and Mr.

Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates.

Mr. A S Sirohi, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 12.03.2025 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the closure report has been filed, he seeks permission to withdraw the present petitions on the ground that The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

they have been rendered infructuous.

2.

Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that the protest petition has been filed before the learned Trial Court.

3.

Parties are at liberty to continue as per law before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate.

4.

The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the protest petitions which may be decided by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in accordance with law.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J MARCH 12, 2025/PB The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.