Godfrey Phillips India Limited v. Twenty Four Seven Retail Stores Pvt Ltd & ANR.

$~48 to 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 95/2025, I.A. 10587/2025-Exp GODFREY PHILLIPS INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

versus TWENTY FOUR SEVEN RETAIL STORES PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through:

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 96/2025, I.A. 10588/2025-Exp GODFREY PHILLIPS INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

versus TWENTY FOUR SEVEN RETAIL STORES PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through:

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 97/2025, I.A. 10589/2025-Exp GODFREY PHILLIPS INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

versus TWENTY FOUR SEVEN RETAIL STORES PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through:

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 98/2025, I.A. 10590/2025-Exp GODFREY PHILLIPS INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

versus TWENTY FOUR SEVEN RETAIL STORES PVT LTD & ANR. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

.....Respondents Through:

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 99/2025, I.A. 10591/2025-Exp GODFREY PHILLIPS INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

versus TWENTY FOUR SEVEN RETAIL STORES PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through:

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 100/2025, I.A. 10592/2025-Exp GODFREY PHILLIPS INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

versus TWENTY FOUR SEVEN RETAIL STORES PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through:

Presence:

Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Swati Sharma, Ms. Surabhi Khattar, Ms. Kamakshi Puri, Mr. Manthan Nagpal, Mr. Sriharsh Raj and Mr. Aryaman Vachhar, Advocates for plaintiff in all items.

Mr. Jayant Mehtra, Sr. Advocate with Ms.

Simran Singh, Mr. Toyesh Tewari, Mr. Agastya Sen and Mr. Vikramaditya Sanghi, Advocates for R-1 in all items.

Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC for R-2 in all items.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 28.04.2025 1.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner seeks permission for The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

withdrawing the present petitions, with liberty to file them afresh. 2.

Liberty, as sought be granted subject to the same being in accordance with law.

3.

Needless to say, since this Court has not gone into the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioner in any of the present petitions, the same, as also the defence(s) sought to be raised by the respondent no.1 will be available to both of them in the subsequent proceedings qua the same cause of action(s).

4.

Petitions along with pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

A copy of this order be kept in connected matters. SAURABH BANERJEE, J.

APRIL 28, 2025/R The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.