Raaj Unocal Lubricants Limited v. Registrar Of Trade Marks

$~27 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C)-IPD 13/2024 RAAJ UNOCAL LUBRICANTS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Apoorva Maheshwari, Advocate.

versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent Through:

Mr.

Aditya Verma, Mr.

Rohan Krishna Seth, Mr. Rigved Prasad and Ms.

Vani Sarin, Advocates for respondent no. 2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 30.04.2025 1.

Counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner has also filed a rectification petition seeking removal of the trade marks which are the subject matter of the present writ petition.

2.

The matter was passed over in order for counsel for the petitioner to take instructions.

3.

Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is willing to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to raise issues with regard to the trade marks registration granted in favour of the respondent in the rectification petition filed by the petitioner. 4.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5.

Needless to state, it will be open for the petitioner to raise all the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2025 at 12:29:26 W.P.(C)-IPD 13/2024

grounds raised in the rectification petition filed by the petitioner. 6.

The questions of law raised in the present writ petition shall be kept open for consideration in an appropriate proceeding. AMIT BANSAL, J APRIL 30, 2025 kd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2025 at 12:29:26 W.P.(C)-IPD 13/2024