Satish Dayal v. Amit Mathur

$~34 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(OS) 374/2011 SATISH DAYAL ..... Plaintiff Through:

Mr. Akshay Makhija, Ms. Sanjugeeta Mohtan & Ms. Mahima Bahl, Advs.

versus AMIT MATHUR ..... Defendant Through:

Mr.Rajat Agnihotri, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 01.02.2016 1.

Since this Court does not have pecuniary jurisdiction in view of the Office Order dated 24.11.2015 issued by Hon'ble the Chief Justice in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015, whereby ordinary suits which are not commercial matters having pecuniary jurisdiction up to the value of rupees two crores cannot be tried by this Court and commercial matters up to the value of rupees one crore cannot be tried by this Court, this suit is transferred for decision to the jurisdictional Court under the District & Sessions Judge (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi.

3.

Let parties appear before the District & Sessions Judge (South), Saket

Courts, New Delhi on 15th March, 2016. Suit file be made available to the District & Sessions Judge (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi, on the date fixed.

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J FEBRUARY 01, 2016/hkaur