Yugal Kishore v. State (NCT Of Delhi) And ANR.
$~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4229/2026, CRL.M.A. 17046/2026 YUGAL KISHORE .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Ravi Kaushal, Advocate along with Petitioner.
versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for state along with Ms. Upasna, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Ms. Niketa, Advocates.
SI- Ashish Grewal, PS: Mandawali.
Mr. Pratyush Prasun and Mr.
Jagjeet Singh, Advocates alongwith R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R
% 26.05.2026 1.
By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.334/2021 dated 09.07.2021 registered at PS.: Mandawali Fazal Pur, Delhi under Sections 323/354(A)/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Compromise Deed dated 25.04.2026 [Annexure P4] arrived between the petitioner and the respondent no.2, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identity.
2.
Issue notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
3.
Respondent no.2, present in Court, also accepts notice and affirms the terms of the aforesaid Compromise Deed dated 25.04.2026 whereby out of total sum of Rs.40,000/-, the petitioner has already paid her a settlement amount of Rs.20,000/- and a Demand Draft being DD No.792143 dated 22.05.2026 (State Bank of India, Branch-E-68A, Pandav Nagar, Delhi) of Rs.20,000/- has been handed over to the respondent no.2 today as full and final settlement of all her present, past and future claims and as such, she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. In addition to the aforesaid, the petitioner has also transferred an amount of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent no.2 through Paytm (reference no.206990850273).
4.
The petitioner and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been identified by the IO. 5.
Facts disclose that a settlement has already been arrived voluntarily between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 and the present petition is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) to that effect. In view thereof, the parties shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived inter se themselves. As such, following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr. (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2014) 6 SCC 466, since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the aforesaid FIR against the petitioner will be an exercise in futility. 6.
Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.334/2021 dated 09.07.2021 registered at PS: Mandawali Fazal Pur, Delhi under The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Sections 323/354(A)/509/34 of the IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.
7.
As such, the present petition, alongwith the pending application, is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J MAY 26, 2026/So The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.