Kishan Kumar v. State

$~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 113/2016 and CRL.M.A. 28928/2018 KISHAN KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Adrian Abbi, Advocate for Ms.Gayatri Nandwani, Standing Counsel (DHCLSC) versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr.Pradeep Gahalot, APP for State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 25.08.2025 1.

By way of the present appeal, the appellant seeks to assail the judgment of conviction dated 09.11.2015 and the order on sentence dated 17.11.2015 of, passed by the learned ASJ (NDPS), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in SC No. 45(1)/12 arising out of FIR No. 129/2008 registered at P.S. Khajuri Khas under Sections 341/392/394/411/34 IPC. Vide the order on sentence, the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years with a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Section 392 IPC. Additionally, he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years with a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for two months for the offence punishable under Section 394 IPC.

He was further sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month with a fine of Rs. 500/-, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for seven days for the offence punishable The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

under Section 341 IPC. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently, with the benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C. extended to the appellant. 2.

The appellant is present in Court and is identified by the I.O. and having undergone the entire sentence and being aware of the consequences, he does not wish to press the present appeal on merits. 3.

The nominal roll dated 22.08.2025 of the appellant has been placed on record as per which the appellant has already completed his sentence as on 13.08.2017. It further records that the fine amounts imposed have been duly paid in jail.

4.

In view of the aforesaid, as the appellant has undergone the entire sentence and does not wish to press the present appeal, the conviction is upheld. The appeal is disposed of as not pressed, along with pending applications, if any.

5.

A copy of this order to be communicated to the concerned Jail Superintendent as well as the Trial Court.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J AUGUST 25, 2025 kb The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/09/2025 at 12:01:25