← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./3513/2024

Hemant Sharma & ANR. v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

2024-09-19Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna3 pages

$~9 & 50 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3513/2024 HEMANT SHARMA & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr.

Garvit and Ms.

Unnimaya, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the State with SI Neetu Bisht PS Paschim Vihar Mr. Setu Niket and Mr. Ishan Singh, Advocates for R-2 + W.P.(CRL) 1663/2024 RITESH CHUGH .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Setu Niket and Mr. Ishan Singh, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Anand V Khatri, ASC for the State with SI Neetu Bisht PS Paschim Vihar Mr.

Garvit and Ms.

Unnimaya, Advocates for R-2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 19.09.2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

1.

The petitioners vide the present petitions under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C, 1973 seek quashing of cross FIRs No. 538/2020 and 620/2020 registered under Sections 506/509/34 IPC & 323/354/506/34 IPC, registered at P.S. Paschim Vihar East, New Delhi and all proceeding emanating therefrom in view of the Settlement arrived at between the parties. 2.

Issue notice. Learned APP and ASC accept notice on behalf of the State.

3.

A request for quashing of the FIR has been made on account of the Settlement inter se the parties. It is stated that it was a neighbourly dispute and the parties have amicably settled all their disputes. The parties have entered into MOU dated 15.12.2023 and have amicably settled all their disputes. The parties endorse the Settlement and shall remain bound by the terms of settlement.

4.

The parties are present before this Court in person today, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer concerned. 5.

Today, the complainants who are present in Court state that they have no objection if the FIR is quashed.

6.

In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion and also the fact that the present matter is a neighbourhood matter it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIRs in question.

7.

Accordingly cross FIRs No. 538/2020 and 620/2020 registered under Sections 506/509/34 IPC & 323/354/506/34 IPC, registered at P.S. Paschim The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Vihar East, New Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

8.

The petitions stand disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J SEPTEMBER 19, 2024/PT The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.