Kailash @ Pintoo v. Sharmanand Tyagi

$~11 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P. 261/2016 & Crl.M.A. Nos.5345/2016 & 5346/2016 KAILASH @ PINTOO ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Azhar Qayam, Adv.

versus SHARMANAND TYAGI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

O R D E R

% 02.09.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though there is an application for condonation of delay of 235 days in filing the present case, the present petition is infructuous inasmuch as the petitioner has already undergone the period of sentence. Consequently, the present petition and applications are not pressed.

P.S.TEJI, J SEPTEMBER 02, 2016/aa