← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./2062/2026

Tarik v. The State NCT Of Delhi

2026-06-08Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna3 pages

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2062/2026, CRL.M.A. 17059/2026 TARIK .....Petitioner Through:

Counsel for Petitioner (appearance not given) versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 08.06.2026 1.

Second Bail Application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., 2023 or Section 438 of Cr.P.C., 1973, has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for grant of Anticipatory Bail in case arising out of FIR No. 240/2026 dated 30.03.2026 under Section 110/126(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Kalindi Kunj, Delhi.

2.

It is stated that in an incident which took place on 29.03.2026 at about 11:30 p.m. in front of B-448, Gali No. 5, Jaitpur Extn., Part-2, Delhi, a petty neighbourhood dispute arose in regard to a scooter parked in front of the Complainant's house. There were five named accused including the Applicant, Tarik. The allegations were that co-accused, Tohid was holding a danda during the altercation while Isha Mohammad was also in possession of a danda and both of them have been released on Police Bail. The role attributed to the Applicant is that he was shown as being present along with the other accused and having participated in the altercation. No use of weapon of any kind has been attributed to him. No overt act of any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

specific nature resulting in injury has been ascribed to him. The Anticipatory Bail Application filed before the learned ASJ, was dismissed on 13.05.2026. The Bail is sought on the ground that the co-accused has been granted Bail. There is no weapon used by the Petitioner. The CCTV footage obtained by the IO of the incident, does not reflect any incriminating act on the part of the Applicant. Investigations are already complete. The relevant evident from the site has already been collected. Nothing has been recovered form the Applicant. The Applicant was unable to join the investigations because of the apprehension of arrest though he is willing to join the investigations. A prayer is, therefore, made for grant of Anticipatory Bail.

3.

Status Report has been filed in the Court, which is taken on record. As per the Complainant on which the FIR was registered, there was a neighbourhood altercation in regard to parking of the scooter in front of the house of the complainant. There were two co-accused, who were allegedly holding a danda. The injuries allegedly caused to be complainant are simple in nature. Anticipatory Bail has been granted to one accused while Regular Bail has been granted to the other two co-accused. Police Bail has been granted to Isha Mohammad.

4.

Considering the nature of allegations and also that all other coaccused have been granted Bail, it is directed that in the event of his arrest, the Petitioner shall be admitted to Anticipatory Bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The Petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer.

(ii) The Petitioner shall join the investigations, as and when called The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

by the Investigating Officer and shall co-operate during the investigations.

(iii) The Petitioner shall furnish his cellphone number to the Investigating Officer on which he may be contacted at any time and shall ensure that the number is kept active and switched-on at all times.

(iv) The petitioner shall not contact, nor visit, nor offer any inducement, threat or promise to any of the prosecution witnesses or other persons acquainted with the facts of case. (v) The petitioner shall not tamper with evidence nor otherwise indulge in any act or omission that is unlawful or that would prejudice the proceedings in the pending trial. 5.

The Bail Application stands disposed of in the above terms. Pending Application also stands disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J JUNE 8, 2026/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.