Bhawani Shankar v. D.T.C. & ANR.

$~R209 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4801/2003 BHAWANI SHANKAR ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus D.T.C. & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms.

Bhakti Pasrija Sethi and Mr.Moksh Pasrija, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

O R D E R

% 20.01.2020 1.

The present writ petition filed by the workman assails the Award dated 08.08.2002 passed by the Industrial Tribunal-II, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in ID No.28/2001. Under the impugned Award, the claim of the petitioner has been rejected in the following terms:- "It appears that the workman is not interested in the prosecution of its case and the statement of claim filed in the Court., On 7.8.2002 none appeared on behalf of the workman to prove the statement of claim and the workman was proceeded exparte and the case was reserve for award. Consequently, in the above mentioned facts the award is passed accordingly. File be consigned to record room."

2.

The record shows that none has been appearing on behalf of the petitioner for the last many dates. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition.

3.

The petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. REKHA PALLI, J.

JANUARY 20, 2020 „sdp‟