Pinnani Sandeep Kumar v. Union Of India

$~27 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 6114/2019 PINNANI SANDEEP KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajashekar Rao with Mr. Vikram Hedge and Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajay Digpual, CGSC with Mr.

Soumava Karmakar, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

O R D E R

% 28.05.2019 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing the respondent to consider the petitioner as an OBC-NCL candidate. Further seeks direction directing the respondent to allocate the petitioner to an appropriate service by considering him as an OBC-NCL candidate.

Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner has admitted on instruction that on not considering the case of the candidate as OBC-NCL, he has not made any representation to the respondent.

Accordingly, I hereby dispose of the present petition giving liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent, within two weeks from today and the same shall be decided by the respondent, within two weeks thereafter.

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

I hereby make it clear that if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision to be taken by the respondent, he may challenge the same before the Central Administrative Tribunal.

Order dasti.

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J MAY 28, 2019 ms