← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/1406/2025

Deepak Relhan v. Union Of India And ORS.

2026-01-27Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravinder Dudeja2 pages

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1406/2025 DEEPAK RELHAN .....Petitioner Through:

Ms.Amrita Verma, Mr.Anshul Patel, Ms.Gauri Kaushik, Mr.Gaurav Mathur, Mr.Mohit Kumar Singh, Ms.Alka Dewedi, Ms.Devashree Sahu and Ms.Sagrika Singh, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms.Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr.Akash Mishra, Adv. for UOI Mrs.Anubha Bhardwaj, SPP with Ms.Ananya Shamshery, Adv. for R-3/CBI Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kumar Arya and Mr.Aryam Sachdeva, Advs. with Insp. Daljeet, PS North Rohini for State Mr.Prashant Diwan and Ms.Ishika Jindal, Advs. for R-5 along with R-5 (through VC)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

O R D E R

% 27.01.2026 1.

The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/01/2026 at 13:40:13

minor daughter of the petitioner.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn support from the order dated 21.03.2025 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, North-West, Rohini, Delhi, in GP No. 109/2022, to submit that the respondent no. 5, the wife of the petitioner, has been absconding and was not traceable; she has also violated repeated orders of the learned Family Court.

3.

During the pendency of the present petition, the parties were exploring the possibility of arriving at an amicable settlement before the Mediation Centre. Unfortunately, the parties could not settle their disputes.

4.

The learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 submits that the respondent no. 5 is presently residing in India and her residential address had been shared, not only with the petitioner but also with the I.O.. She further submits that the respondent no. 5 would abide by all the directions of the learned Family Court, subject to her rights to avail of her legal remedies thereagainst.

5.

In view of the above developments, no further orders are required in the present petition.

6.

The present petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the parties to avail of their remedies in accordance with law. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J JANUARY 27, 2026/sg/as The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/01/2026 at 13:40:13