Malwa Leasing & Credits Pvt Ltd v. Gyanender Singh
$-37-40.
»
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.L.P. 137/2014 and Crl.M.A. No. 2538/2014 + CRL.L.P. 140/2014 and Crl.M.A. No. 2567/2014 + CRL.L.P. 141/2014 and Crl.M.A. No.2569/2014 + CRL.L.P. 142/2014 and Crl.M.A. No. 2571/2014 MALWA LEASING & CREDITS PVT LTD Petitioner Through:
Mr. Suman Kapur, Advocate.
versus GYANENDER SINGH Respondent Through:
Mr. Manish Gandhi & Mr. Hemant Verma, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
ORDER
% 08.04.2015 Mr. Kapur, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states, on instructions, that he does not wish to pursue these petitions and accepts the impugned judgments. However, he states that in respect of the two vehicles, which were stolen, the petitioner has not been able to receive the insurance claim on account of non-submission of certain documents. He submits that the respondent should cooperate with the petitioner so that the insurance claim can be processed.
Learned counsel for the respondent states that in terms of the mediated settlement arrived at between the parties, the respondent has already delivered the documents as per the settlement dated 09.08.2012, By:AMULYA
except the copy of the driving license. The same has also been recorded by the learned Magistrate. Learned counsel for the respondent, however, assures that the respondent is even now ready & willing to cooperate with the petitioner by providing the driving license and any further documents, which may be available with the respondent and which may be required for processing the claim of the petitioner in respect of the two lost vehicles, however, the same shall be without creating any liability on the respondent. Since the petitioner has voluntarily stated that the petitioner does not wish to pursue these petitions, the directions issued by the learned Magistrate for initiation of separate inquiry under Section 340 Cr.P.C. is set aside.
The petitions stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. VIPINSANGHI,J APRIL 08, 2015 B.S. Rohella