Manish Kumar & ORS. v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) & ANR.

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 06.05.2024 + MANISH KUMAR & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Ashok Tobria, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Pathak, Mr. Yasar Usmani, Mr. S. Y. Usmani and Mr. M. S.

Yadav, Advocates.

versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for State with ASI Gayatri, P.S.: Mohan Garden.

Mr. Nitesh Sharma, Mr. Tushar Kukreja, Mr. Mohit Vashist and Ms. Ashu Jain, Advocates for R-2 with R-2-in-person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA %

J U D G M E N T

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 13785/2024 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 3597/2024 1.

Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C.') has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 0186/2021, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at P.S.: Mohan Garden and proceedings emanating therefrom. 2.

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for

respondent No. 2 along with respondent No. 2 in person appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3.

In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 06.05.2019. No child was born out of the wedlock. Due to temperamental differences, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 26.04.2021.

4.

The disputes have been amicably resolved between the parties vide settlement deed dated 27.10.2023. The marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide judgment dated 28.03.2024.

5.

Balance amount of Rs. 2,50,000/- has been paid to respondent No. 2 today through DD No. 868507 dated 09.04.2024 drawn on Punjab National Bank, Dwarka North, New Delhi Branch in favour of respondent No. 2, towards full and final settlement between the parties. 6.

Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7.

Petitioners as well as respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by ASI Gayatri, P.S.: Mohan Garden. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and he has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

8.

Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 0186/2021, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at P.S.: Mohan Garden and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.

Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.

MAY 06, 2024/R