← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./1060/2018

Anjana Singh v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR

2018-02-28Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva2 pages

$~57 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1060/2018 ANJANA SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Abinash K. Mishra and Ms.

Sakshi Rani, Advs.

versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Anita Abraham, Addl. PP for the State with IO Mr. Ravinder Sherawat, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 28.02.2018 Crl. M.A. 3833/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 1060/2018 1.

The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 415 of 2014 under Sections 289/323/506 of the IPC Police Station Paschim Vihar, New Delhi, based on a settlement.

2.

The parties are neighbours. The cross FIRs were registered. As per the settlement the petitioner has agreed to the compounding of the offences in respect of the FIR registered on the complaint of the petitioner being FIR No. 419/2014 under Section 506/509/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar, New Delhi. It is submitted that appropriate statement has already been recorded before the trial court for compounding of the CRL.M.C. 1060/2018

offences.

3.

The parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation at Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. 4.

Both the parties are present in person in Court today, represented by their counsels and are identified by the Investigating Officer. They submit that they have settled all their disputes with the intervention of locals and respectable people of the locality. They confirm and undertake that they shall ensure peace and harmony in the locality. They further submit that they are do not wish to press the criminal complaints against each other any further.

5.

In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties has been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would also be expedient to quash the subject FIRs and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

6.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 415 of 2014 under Sections 289/323/506 of the IPC Police Station Paschim Vihar, New Delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed.

7.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J FEBRUARY 28, 2018 'rs'

CRL.M.C. 1060/2018