Usha Kapoor v. Delhi Jal Board And ANR.

$~28.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6171/2019 USHA KAPOOR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. A.K. Panwar, Adv.

versus DELHI JAL BOARD AND ANR.

..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna with Mr.

Devanshu, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR

O R D E R

% 29.05.2019 CM APPL. 26537/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 6171/2019 & C.M. No. 26536/2019 The petitioner assails the order dated 20.05.2019, whereby the petitioner's interim application M.A. No. 666/2019 has been declined. The petitioner had sought stay of the penalty of 20% cut in pension for a period of ten years imposed upon her vide order dated 07.08.2018. O.A. No. 572/2019 had been filed by the petitioner to assail the said penalty and she had moved the stay application with the Original

Application.

Considering the fact that the Original Application is listed before the Tribunal on 09.07.2019, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. However, we make it clear that on the next date of hearing, no adjournment shall be sought or be granted to either of the parties. In case, the respondents wish to file their reply before the Tribunal, they shall do so within 4 weeks, failing which their right of filing the same shall stand closed.

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. VIPIN SANGHI, J RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J MAY 29, 2019 N.Khanna