Neetu Yadav v. Delhi Development Authority

$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8057/2026 & CM APPL. 38571/2026 MS. NEETU YADAV .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Anurag Singh Tomar & Ms.

Shivangi Shokeen, Advs.

versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Adv. (through VC).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

O R D E R

% 03.06.2026 1.

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2.

The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the following prayers:- "

"

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/06/2026 at 11:41:56

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no show cause notice was issued by the DDA before passing of the impugned notice dated 27.05.2026.

4.

Learned counsel for the DDA, on advance notice, submits that the present petition will be treated as a representation and will be decided by the competent authority within a period of two weeks from today. 5.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, with direction to the DDA to consider the present petition as a representation, and after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the same shall be disposed of, within a period of two weeks from today by way of a special order.

6.

Needless to the state that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. till the passing of the speaking order by the competent authority. 7.

Pending application (s), if any, also stands disposed of. 8.

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court, forthwith. AMIT SHARMA, J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 3, 2026/nk/db The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/06/2026 at 11:41:56