← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/8249/2026

Nigam Kumar Shukla v. Union Of India And Others

2026-06-17Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Madhu Jain,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Tejas Karia2 pages

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURTOF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8249/2026 NIGAM KUMAR SHUKLA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Raghunath Pathak, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through:

Ms. Arti Bansal, CGSO with Mr.

Shivam Sharma, GP.

Mr. Ajay Pal, Law Officer, CRPF and Mr. Prashant W., CRPF.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

O R D E R

% 17.06.2026 1.

This is a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeking direction against Respondent seeking following prayers: "a) Issue a Writ in the nature of certiorari or Mandamus or such other appropriate writ or orders directing the Director General CRPF to decide the representation dated 27.05.2026 sympathetically and extend the transfer posting for 1 year while taking into account the medical condition of the wife of the petitioner.

b) Direct the Director General not to take any coercive action against the petitioner till decision of the representation dated 27.05.2026 is made out. c) Pass any such further order/order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." 2.

Issue Notice. Learned Counsel for the Respondents accepts Notice. 3.

The main grievance of the Petitioner in this Petition is that the Representation dated 27.05.2026 made by the Petitioner has not been decided by the Director General CRPF.

4.

Learned Counsel for the Respondents makes a statement on instructions that the said representation shall be decided within a period of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/06/2026 at 11:00:36

two weeks from today.

5.

In view of the same, the said statement is taken on record and the Respondents are directed to be bound by the said statement. 6.

Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in the present Petition.

7.

The Petition stands disposed of in view of the aforesaid directions. TEJAS KARIA, J (VACATION JUDGE) MADHU JAIN, J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 17, 2026/JYH/Av The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/06/2026 at 11:00:36