High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/796/2001

Laxmi Traders & ANR. v. UOI & ANR.

2016-02-25Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S.Muralidhar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru1 pages

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-68 + W.P.(C) 796/2001 & CM APPL 2234/2001 LAXMI TRADERS & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: None.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for UOI.

Mr. Kamal Nijhawan, Senior standing counsel for R-2.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 25.02.2016

1. None appears for the Petitioners. It seems that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. The pending application also stands dismissed.

2. It is made clear that the application for restoration will be entertained only if it is supported by the affidavit of the party concerned. Also, an advance copy should be served on the counsel who appeared last for the Respondent.

S. MURALIDHAR, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J FEBRUARY 25, 2016/Rk