Anil Kumar v. State

$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 317/2016 ANIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms.Suman Chauhan, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.R.S.Kundu, A.S.C. for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 03.05.2016 Crl.M.A.No.7182/2016 1.

This instant application has been moved by the petitioner seeking furlough for a period of three weeks.

2.

Perusal of the record shows that the writ petition has already been dismissed vide order dated 01.02.2016.

3.

Since it is a disposed of matter, such application is not maintainable. The petitioner is at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law.

4.

The application is dismissed.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

MAY 03, 2016 'st'