Sunita Sharma v. State & ORS.

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TEST.CAS. 47/2019 & I.A. 10169/2021 SUNITA SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Karan Balraj Mehta, Adv.

with petitioner in person versus STATE & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. T.S. Nanda, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Dhruv Chawla, Ms. Anita Kumari and Ms. Divita Dutta, Advs. for R-2 to R-4

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR O R D E R (ORAL) % 13.08.2021 (Video-Conferencing) I.A. 10169/2021 (under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC) in TEST.CAS. 47/2019 1.

Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this testamentary case.

2.

The petitioner is also present in person. Her husband, who appears on her behalf, submits that they are persons of advanced stage, and that their health has deteriorated to a point where they are not in a position to prosecute these proceedings. They, therefore, reiterate to withdraw these proceedings.

3.

Learned counsel for the opposite parties does not oppose the prayer.

TEST.CAS. 47/2019 By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI 19:21:13

4.

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. 5.

The application stands allowed accordingly.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

AUGUST 13, 2021 dsn TEST.CAS. 47/2019 By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI 19:21:13