Madhavdatta Pandey v. Union Of India & ANR.

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10830/2022 MADHAVDATTA PANDEY .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, Central Government Standing Counsel with Ms. Geetanjali Tyagi, Govt. Pleader for R1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

O R D E R

% 29.11.2024 1.

This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the Petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Respondents to regularize his appointment.

2.

Order sheets are replete with adjournments on behalf of the Petitioner on one pretext or the order. Even the documents undertaken to be filed have not been filed so far.

3.

Petitioner has been represented on and off as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for Respondent No.1.

4.

None appears to represent the Petitioner even today. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. 5.

The writ Petition is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution and in default.

JYOTI SINGH, J NOVEMBER 29, 2024/jg The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/12/2024 at 10:24:54