Ompal Singh v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner And ANR

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 830/2017 OMPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. R.R. Singh, Advocate versus REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Keshav Mohan & Mr. Piyush Choudhary, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr.

L.K.

Passi, Advocate for respondent No.2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 23.11.2017 Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submitted that an amount of Rs.1,70,672/- has already been credited on 1.3.2017 and the amount of Rs.1,84,440/- with up-to-date interest has been released from the Office of respondent No.1 vide NEFT on 3.4.2017 to the member's account No.30100429737 vide IFCI Code No.SBIN0010079. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent No.1 has credited the amount only, but has not furnished the details of the interest. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has submitted that, in case there is going to be any deficit/deficiency in the amount, then the petitioner may move a representation before the Department and the Department shall consider the same within fifteen days and do the needful, if required. Learned counsel for respondent

No.1 has further submitted that nothing further survives in this writ petition and the same has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, in view of the aforesaid submissions, the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Dasti.

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J NOVEMBER 23, 2017 tp