Mr. Ranjiv Khanna v. Bses Yamuna Power Limited & ANR.
$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9447/2023 & CM APPL 36055/2023 MR. RANJIV KHANNA .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Tanmay Mehta and Mr. Arhum Sayeed, Advs.
Versus
BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora and Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Mohd. Irsad, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Nasreen and Mr. Kunal Raj, Advs. for R-2 Mr. Jagjeet Singh and Mr. R.D.
Singh, Advs. for R-3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 25.07.2024 1.
The petitioner in the instant petition prays for the following reliefs:- "I. Issue a Writ of Mandamus, and/or any other appropriate Writ/Order or directions restraining the Respondent No. 1 from installing the meter of Property No. 1900, Main Road, Chandni Chowk, bearing and C.A. No. 100217044 and old Meter No. BY70122210 in the middle of the staircase of Petitioner's property bearing Property No. 1899, Main Road, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006.
II . In the event of meter being installed before the listing of the Petition, issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ/order or directions directing the removal of the above-mentioned meter from the middle of staircase of Property No. 1899, Main Road, Chandni Chowk, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2024 at 11:46:30
Delhi-110006 and installing the same outside Shop No. 1900, Main Road, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006.
III. Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of Justice ."
2.
In view of the provision under Section 42(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003, there appears to be Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF) under the Electricity Act, 2003. The appeal against the order of CGRF lies before the Ombudsman under Section 42(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003. 3.
Looking at the grievance raised in the instant writ petition and competing claims of the petitioner and respondent No.3, the Court is not inclined to entertain the instant petition. However, the Court leaves it open to the petitioner to take appropriate legal remedy, as available in accordance with law.
4.
Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. All rights and contentions are left open.
5.
The petitioner shall also be entitled to file appropriate application seeking any interim protection, if he so desire. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 25, 2024 p‟ma The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2024 at 11:46:30