← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/6692/2024

Bhamesh Goel & ANR. v. Mcd And ORS

2024-05-10Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sachin Datta2 pages

$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6692/2024 & CM APPL.27903/2024 (Stay) BHAMESH GOEL & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Inderbir S. Alugh, Sr. Adv.

alongwith Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr.

Adv., Mr. Mayank Ashok Sharma, Advs. alongwith petitioners in person.

versus MCD AND ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Arjun Mahajan, SC for MCD alongwith Mr. Apoorv Upmanyu and Mr. Rishab Bhalla, Advs. for MCD.

Mr.

Arun Panwar, Adv.

for SHO/Delhi Police.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA % 10.05.2024

O R D E R

CM APPL.27904/2024 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 6692/2024 1.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioners being aggrieved by action of the respondent/MCD in sealing the property of the petitioners bearing Private/Shop No.3, 4346, Gali No.4C, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi-110002.

2.

The petitioner no.1 is stated to be the owner/occupier of the property in question since 1996. The petitioners being advocates are using the premises in question for the purpose of their lawyers chamber. 3.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the sealing The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 09:50:38

action is completely unjustified inasmuch as the property for the purpose of running their chamber, cannot be characterised as misuse. 4.

Although a notice is stated to have been given by the MCD to the petitioner prior to the sealing action, admittedly, the petitioners were not heard prior to the sealing action.

5.

After some hearing, learned counsel for the respondent/MCD submits that the sealing order with regard to the petitioners' premises shall be withdrawn and the property shall be de-sealed forthwith. Further, an appropriate order shall be passed after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners.

6.

The aforesaid statement of learned counsel for the MCD is taken on record. Let a hearing be afforded to the petitioners within a period of four weeks from today. Let a reasoned order be passed, within a period of four weeks thereafter.

7.

With the aforesaid directions, the present petition, alongwith pending application/s, stands disposed of.

SACHIN DATTA, J MAY 10, 2024/r The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 09:50:38