Arpit Gupta v. State (Delhi Administration)

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1560/2019 ARPIT GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through None versus STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) ..... Respondent Through Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for the State with IO/SI Sandeep, P.S.: Mangol Puri Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate for Complainant

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

O R D E R

% 08.11.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1560/2019 (anticipatory bail) None has appeared on behalf of petitioner even on the second call. Learned counsel for the complainant and learned APP for the State submit that address of the petitioner also could not be verified by the IO, as the petitioner is not residing at the given address or given in the memo of parties.

Since none has appeared for the petitioner, this application is dismissed in default.

BRIJESH SETHI, J NOVEMBER 08, 2019 savita