Anupama Harit v. State (NCT) Of Delhi & ORS

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 312/2016 ANUPAMA HARIT ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.B.S.Chowdhary, Advocate versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Rahul Mehra, St.Counsel for the State with Mr.Amrit Singh & Mr.Sanyog Bahadur, Advocates with Inspector Praveen Kumar PS Farsh Bazar Respondent No.4 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 03.03.2016 1.

By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C., petitioner is seeking directions to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to provide protection to the petitioner and her husband from respondent No.4.

2.

Today, respondent No.4., who is father of the petitioner, is present in person and placed on record his handwritten statement to the effect that he has no objection with the marriage of her daughter with Manish Sharma and she is free to reside with him and his family members. 3.

In view of the above assurance given by the father of the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition.

4.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5.

As prayed, copy of the order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

MARCH 03, 2016/'pg'