High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/943/2002
M/S Ritspin Sunthetics Ltd. v. Cegat & ANR.
2016-02-25Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S.Muralidhar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru1 pages
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-97 + W.P.(C) 943/2002 RITSPIN SYNTHESIS LTD ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus CEGAT & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Sonia Sharma, Sr. Standing counsel.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R
% 25.02.2016
1. None appears for the Petitioners. It seems that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. It is made clear that the application for restoration will be entertained only if it is supported by the affidavit of the party concerned. Also, an advance copy should be served on the counsel who appeared last for the Respondent.
S. MURALIDHAR, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J FEBRUARY 25, 2016/Rk