Pankaj @ Birendra Age 35 Year v. Ms. Meenakshi Age 29 Year & ANR.

$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 634/2024 PANKAJ @ BIRENDRA AGE 35 YEAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocate with petitioner in person.

versus MS. MEENAKSHI AGE 29 YEAR & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA

O R D E R

% 13.05.2024 CRL.M.A. 14583/2024 Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 („Cr.P.C.‟) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner/applicant for condonation of delay of 66 days in re-filing the petition. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 66 days in re-filing the petition is condoned.

Application is accordingly disposed of.

CRL.REV.P. 634/2024 Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 („Cr.P.C.‟) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner challenging order dated 24.01.2024 passed by learned Principal The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:18:45

Judge, Family Courts West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby the interim maintenance was awarded @ Rs. 9,000/- per month (Rs, 4,500/- for wife and Rs. 4,500/- for the child).

After partly making the submissions, learned counsel for petitioner does not press the petition.

Taking the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner on record, petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J MAY 13, 2024/akc The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:18:45