Ram Prakash v. Union Of India & ORS

r-'irS.

Hic» COOTI OF OILBI AT NFW KT""

.

W,P.,C, - « APPF NJliU (»'I"""""«'• °® "

ramPRAKASH ^ Advocate.

versus TT^ o AXTD ..Respondents PUNJABnation^ ^ Advocate forR-2.

r T? 7 Mr. JagatArora,Advocatefor R-iwP(C) 976/2016and C.M. Appl. No. 4294«016(for stay, U/S mCPC'^Article226oftheConstitutionofIndia) + Petitioner . JTCtitlwiAwx ram PRAKASH vishwendra Verma and Through, Advocates.

versus Respondents unionofINDIA Arora,Advocatefor R-U Mr. RajeshKumarGautam,Advocate for R-2.

W.P.(C)7814/2016and C.M.Appl.No. 32296/2016(U/S151 r/wArticle226 oftheConstitutionofIndia) Petitioner RAMPRAKASH^ Mr.

Vishwendra Verma and + Mr.GaneshKumar,Advocates.

versus W.P.fC)10549/2016 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Advocate for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA

ORDER

% 08.11.2016 1.

Counsel for the petitioner states that since a criminal case pertaining to FIR no. 349/2013 is pending, as such, for the present, these writ petitions are not pressed, but liberty be granted to the petitioner to file writ petitions for seeking appropriaterelief after closure of the criminal case proceedings pertaining to FIR no. 349/2013.

2.

Petitionsare accordinglynot pressedwith the aforesaidliberty. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J NOVEMBER 08,2016 M,