Rajeev Ranjan Singh @Raju Singh, v. State Ofnct Delhi
$~53 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C.
3203/2025 & CRL.M.A.
14089/2025, CRL.M.A. 14090/2025 RAJEEV RANJAN SINGH @RAJU SINGH, .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Vishnu Sharma and Ms.
Kritika Bhatnagar, Advs.
versus STATE OFNCT DELHI .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State with SI Khushbu Yadav, PS Kalkaji.
Mr. Kapil Gupta, Mr. Ravi Kumar and Ms. Rishika Agarwal, Advs. for the complainant with the complainant in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 07.05.2025 1.
The present petition is filed challenging the order dated 29.01.2025, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Saket Courts, New Delhi in SC No. 2202/2016, whereby the petitioner's right to address final arguments was closed noting that the matter has been listed for final arguments since 22.11.2024, and repeated adjournments were taken on behalf of the petitioner stating the absence of the arguing counsel. 2.
On being pointedly asked, it is stated that the matter has still not been finally heard and the prosecution has not completed The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
its arguments.
3.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned counsel, who has been representing the petitioner before the learned Trial Court, has been keeping unwell. 4.
He submits that one opportunity may be granted to the petitioner to address arguments.
5.
He submits that no prejudice would be caused since the prosecution has still not advanced arguments. 6.
Considering that the arguments have still not concluded and the prosecution is yet to argue, this Court considers it apposite in the interest of justice to grant one final opportunity to the petitioner to address final arguments.
7.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned counsel who has been handling the case of the petitioner since the beginning is unwell and will be available after 10-15 days. He submits that the learned counsel will appear on 23.05.2025 or any suitable date thereafter to address final arguments.
8.
He submits that no further adjournments would be taken on behalf of the petitioner.
9.
The matter is listed today at 02:00 PM before the learned Trial Court.
10.
The learned Trial Court is requested to fix a date for arguments of the petitioner on 23.05.2025 or any suitable date thereafter.
11.
The learned Trial Court is also requested to not grant any unwarranted adjournment to the petitioner or any other parties. 12.
It is made clear that if the arguments are not finally advanced on behalf of the petitioner on the dated fixed, the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
learned Trial Court will be at liberty to pass a final order after considering the written arguments on behalf of the petitioner. 13.
The present petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. AMIT MAHAJAN, J MAY 7, 2025 'KDK'
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.