Ms Soni Chaudhary & ORS. v. Smt Rozy Khanna & ORS.

$~11 to 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 570/2023, CM APPL. 36875/2023 MS SONI CHAUDHARY & ORS.

.....Appellants Through:

Mr. Pramod Kr Sharma, Mr. Manish Kr Sharma, Ms. Neeti Bhardwaj, Mr. Haridwar Singh and Ms. Anushka Verma, Advocates versus MR RAJESH KHANNA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. I.P. Singh Advocate for R-5 + RFA 571/2023, CM APPL. 36881/2023 MS SONI CHAUDHARY & ORS.

.....Appellants Through:

Mr. Pramod Kr Sharma, Mr. Manish Kr Sharma, Ms. Neeti Bhardwaj, Mr. Haridwar Singh and Ms. Anushka Verma, Advocates versus SMT ROZY KHANNA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. I.P. Singh Advocate for R-5 + RFA 572/2023, CM APPL. 36883/2023 MS SONI CHAUDHARY & ORS.

.....Appellants Through:

Mr. Pramod Kr Sharma, Mr. Manish Kr Sharma, Ms. Neeti Bhardwaj, Mr. Haridwar Singh and Ms. Anushka Verma, Advocates versus MR PARVESH KUMAR KHANNA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. I.P. Singh Advocate for R-5 + RFA 573/2023, CM APPL. 36885/2023 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

MS SONI CHAUDHARY & ORS.

.....Appellants Through:

Mr. Pramod Kr Sharma, Mr. Manish Kr Sharma, Ms. Neeti Bhardwaj, Mr. Haridwar Singh and Ms. Anushka Verma, Advocates versus SMT SUNITA KHANNA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. I.P. Singh Advocate for R-5

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 13.02.2026 1.

The aforesaid four Appeal have been filed by the Appellants for partition of the different portions of one property, which is claimed to have been inherited from the father.

2.

The objection was taken that 04 separate Partition Suits could have been filed and there should have been one consolidated Suit filed on behalf of the Appellants.

3.

In the Order dated 03.11.2023, it was noted that the Appellant may be given an opportunity to file one consolidated Suit. Submissions heard from the parties.

4.

In view of the submissions, the Appellants are at liberty to file one consolidated Suit or he may seek amendment in one Suit and withdraw the other three Suits in accordance with law.

5.

The contentions of the parties in respect of the limitation of their substantive rights may be raised before the learned Trial Court. 6.

Ms. Sudesh Kaur, Plaintiff No. 4 has already been impleaded as Respondent No. 5.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

7.

The impugned Order dated 21.04.2023 is hereby set aside. 8.

Let the needful be done within 30 days.

9.

The Appeals alongwith pending Applications, are disposed of accordingly.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

FEBRUARY 13, 2026 N The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.