Mansi Wadhwa And ANR v. Manish Wadhwa And ORS

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5080/2023 MANSI WADHWA AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Kuldeep Rana, Advocate.

versus MANISH WADHWA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Abhinav Kajal, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

Mr.

Ashneet Singh, APP for State/respondent Nos. 5 and 6 with SI Anup Rana, P.S. Paschim Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 28.05.2024 CRL.M.A. 11212/2024 1.

By way of present application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners seek early hearing of the present petition. 2.

With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for hearing today itself. The date already fixed i.e. 01.08.2024 stands cancelled. 3.

Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 5080/2023 1.

During the course of submissions, learned counsel for the petitioners state that he restricts the prayer to the extent that the petitioners be permitted to install a new window AC, in place of earlier one, as well as a new cable TV connection in the premises, which is under the possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners shall be bearing The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/05/2024 at 12:10:48

the service/installation charges for the same. 2.

Learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4, on instructions, states that the answering respondents have no objection to the aforesaid prayer of the petitioners, subject to handing over of the earlier AC to the respondents and bearing of the cost/installation charges by the petitioners. 3.

In view of the above, the petitioners shall be at liberty to install a new window AC at their cost, after handing over the earlier AC to the respondents.

Insofar as cable TV connection is concerned, though the impugned order records that the earlier cable TV connection was disabled for the reason of non-payment of bill, the petitioners shall be at liberty to either seek renewal of the same or get a fresh cable TV connection. 4.

Needless to state that passing of the aforesaid order would not create any equity in favour of either of the party.

5.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Dasti.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MAY 28, 2024 ga The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/05/2024 at 12:10:48