The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. Royaltaj India Resorts Private Limited
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 498/2023 & I.A. 13585/2023.
THE INDIAN HOTELS COMPANY LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through:
Mr. Achuthan Sreekumar, Mr. Rohil Bansal and Mr. Swastik Bisarya, Advocates.
versus ROYALTAJ INDIA RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R
% 30.04.2024 1.
The matter stands settled with the facilitation of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, and the settlement agreement dated 29th February, 2024 has been executed between the parties. The said agreement has been duly singed by authorised signatories of the parties, as well as, counter signed by respective counsels.
2.
The Court has perused the terms of the settlement, which are recorded as under:
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
3.
The Court finds the terms of the settlement to be lawful and acceptable. 4.
Parties will be bound by the terms of the settlement as executed by them. 5.
Let decree sheet be drawn up accordingly.
6.
In view of the settlement between the parties, plaintiff is entitled to get refund of Court fees.
7.
Accordingly, registry is directed to refund the full Court Fees to plaintiff. 8.
Counsel for plaintiff states that compliances have been done by defendant, except for para 7 (a) of the settlement agreement. 9.
Defendant is additionally directed to take down all such references within a period of two weeks as listed in para 7 (a) (listing on facebook). 10.
The suit is disposed of in these terms.
11.
Pending applications if any, are rendered infructuous. 12.
Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J APRIL 30, 2024/RK Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.