Raj Kumar Sharma v. Sanjeev Bansal

$~175 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 402/2019 & CM Appls.30018/2019, 30020/2019, 31249/2020 RAJ KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Tushar Mudgal, Adv.

versus SANJEEV BANSAL .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Ajay Gupta, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

O R D E R

% 30.01.2025 1.

Learned Counsel for the parties submits that the parties have amicable settled the matter.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, submits that the possession of the subject premises has been handed over to the Respondent.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, affirms that the Respondent has received possession of the subject premises.

4.

In view of the aforegoing, learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the present Petition. 5.

The present Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. All pending Applications stand closed.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/02/2025 at 10:33:44

6.

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J JANUARY 30, 2025/r Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/02/2025 at 10:33:44