Vinod Baisla & ORS v. The State & ORS

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1818/2019 VINOD BAISLA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Advocate alongwith petitioners in person versus THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State with SI Jagjeewan Ram and ASI Tuli Ram, P.S.: Badarpur Respondent nos. 2 and 3 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

O R D E R

% 10.10.2019 The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No. 184/2018, under Sections 452/323/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at P.S.: Badarpur and the proceedings emanating therefrom. Learned ASC for the State submits that the petitioners and respondent no.2 are neighbours. A dispute over a trivial issue led to the registration of the aforementioned FIR against the petitioner. The Investigating Officer, who is present in the Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent no.2.

The petitioners and respondent no.2 have submitted that they have settled their disputes amicably vide MoU dated 24.04.2019. Respondent no.2 reiterates the aforesaid facts and submits that they

have amicably settled their dispute without any pressure or coercion from any source whatsoever. Respondent no.2 has further submitted that she has no objection if the FIR is quashed and the petition is allowed. In view of the above facts, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No.184/2018, under Sections 452/323/506/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S.: Badarpur and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

BRIJESH SETHI, J OCTOBER 10, 2019 savita