Vipul Sachdeva v. State & ANR.

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 869/2013 VIPUL SACHDEVA ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr.Anil Sethi, Adv versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr.Arun Kumar Sharma, APP for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

O R D E R

% 28.03.2016 Crl.M.A.No.17949/2015 (revival) Pursuant to the order dated 21.01.2016, respondent No.2 could not be served for the reason that he has left the given address. On taking requisite steps, let service be effected upon respondent No.2 at the correct address, returnable for 30.05.2016. SURESH KAIT, J MARCH 28, 2016 M