Narendra Kumar And ORS v. State Gnct Of Delhi And ANR
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3913/2024 NARENDRA KUMAR AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through:
Mr Vinay Kumar, Mr Chetan Kadam and Mr Kuldip Chand, Advocates along with petitioner nos.1, 2 and 4 in person.
versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through:
Mr Hitesh Vali, APP for the State with SI Kavish, PS Inderpuri.
Mr Nitesh Rana, Mr Manish Dixit, Mr Diwaker Chaudhary, Mr Yogesh Tiwari and Mr Arjun Singh Sisodia, Advocates for R-2 along with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 15.05.2024 CRL.M.A. 14949/2024 1.
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.A. 14950/2024 2.
The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner no.3 seeking exemption from appearance of the petitioner no.3. 3.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed, 4.
The application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 3913/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
5.
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No.0174/2018 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Inder Puri, Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the ground that the parties have arrived at a settlement.
6.
Issue notice. The learned APP for the State accepts notice. He submits that since the FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute and the parties have arrived at a settlement, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.
7.
The petitioner no.1 (former husband) and petitioner nos.2 and 4, who are father and brother of the petitioner no.1 respectively, as well as, respondent no. 2 (former wife) are present in the Court and they have been identified by their respective counsel and by the Investigating Officer SI Kavish, PS Inderpuri.
8.
The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 05.02.2016 according to Hindu Rites and Customs. No child was born out of the said wedlock. 9.
On account of temperamental issues certain disputes arose between the parties and they started living separately since April, 2018. The dispute between the parties also led to the registration of present FIR. 10.
During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties were referred to Counselling Cell, attached to the Family Court, West District, Tis Hazari, Delhi, where they arrived at a settlement, terms whereof were reduced in writing in the form of Settlement dated 20.09.2023, a copy of which is annexed as Annexure P-4 (Colly.) to the present petition. 11.
In terms of the said settlement, the parties decided to dissolve their The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
marriage by filing a petition for divorce by way of mutual consent. Accordingly, the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have obtained a decree of divorce dated 16.12.2023, a copy of which is annexed as Annexure P-5 (Colly.) to the present petition.
12.
It is a term of the settlement between the parties that the petitioner no.1 shall pay a total sum of Rs.1,50,000/- to the respondent no.2 towards full and final settlement of all her claims on account of streedhan, permanent alimony, dowry articles, maintenance (past, present and future) etc. Out of the said amount, a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- has already been paid by the petitioner no.1 to the respondent no.2 in the manner as mentioned in the settlement. The remaining amount of Rs.50,000/- has been paid to the respondent no.2 today in the court by the petitioner no.1 by way of Demand Draft bearing No.557568 dated 06.03.2024 issued by Canara Bank, Shadipur Branch, Delhi.
13.
The receipt of entire amount of Rs.1,50,000/- is acknowledged by the respondent no.2, who is present in court.
14.
The respondent no.2, on a query put by the Court, states that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed.
15.
In view of the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement, no useful purpose will be served in continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them.
16.
It is, thus, in the interest of justice that the present FIR and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom be quashed. 17.
Consequently, the petition is allowed and the FIR No.0174/2018 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Inder Puri, Delhi alongwith all other proceedings emanating therefrom, is quashed. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
18.
The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. 19.
Order be uploaded on the website of this court. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J MAY 15, 2024 MK The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.