High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/8103/2003
Principal Resident Commissioner v. Additional Commissioner S.Tax,
2016-03-18Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S.Muralidhar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru1 pages
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-154.
+ W.P.(C)8103/2003 PRINCIPAL RESIDENT COMMISSIONER ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER SALES TAX ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R
% 18.03.2016
1. Despite a pass over, none appears for the Petitioner.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. It is made clear that the application for restoration will be entertained only if it is supported by the affidavit of the party concerned. Also, an advance copy should be served on the counsel who appeared last for the Respondent. S. MURALIDHAR, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J MARCH 18, 2016 mg