High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/8380/2003

Sunil Pandey v. UOI

2016-03-18Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S.Muralidhar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru1 pages

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-155.

+ W.P.(C)8380/2003 &CM 13555/2003 SUNIL PANDEY ..... Petitioner Through: None.

versus UOI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Rachit Goel, Advocate for UOI.

Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Bhavishya Sharma, Advocate for Custom.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 18.03.2016

1. Despite a pass over, none appears for the Petitioner.

2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

3. It is made clear that the application for restoration will be entertained only if it is supported by the affidavit of the party concerned. Also, an advance copy should be served on the counsel for the Respondents. S. MURALIDHAR, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J MARCH 18, 2016/mg