Ajay Kumar Singh v. The State Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR.
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3288/2025, CRL.M.A. 14469/2025, CRL.M.A. 14470/2025 AJAY KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Punit Jain and Mr. Anand P. Jain, Advocates.
versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
.....Respondent Through:
Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Ld.
APP for the State with SI Pardeep Kumar P.S. Gazipur, East.
Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 27.05.2025 1.
The present Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking to quash the FIR No. 10/2021 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Ghaipur, Delhi.
2.
Brief facts of the case are that the marriage was solemnized between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 on 20.06.2009 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. It is stated that a female child was born out of the said wedlock on 10.09.2013. Thereafter, due to temperamental issues between the parties, they started residing separately. 3.
It is further submitted that on the Complaint of Respondent No. 2, an The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
FIR bearing No. 10/2021 under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 got registered at Police Station Ghazipur. 4.
It is stated that both the parties amicably settled all the disputes and differences vide MOU dated 04.01.2024, and it was inter alia settled between the parties that the respondent No. 2/wife and the petitioner No. 1/husband shall dissolve their marriage by decree of mutual consent. It is stated that petitioner No. 1/husband shall pay a sum of Rs. 6,00,000/- to the respondent No. 2/wife towards full and final amount of all the claims of the respondent No. 2/wife. It is also stated that the petitioner No. 1 has already paid Rs. 4,00,000 to respondent No. 2/wife in two instalments viz., Rs. 2,00,000/- was paid at the time of execution of MOU dated 04.01.2024 and another Rs.2,00,000/- was paid at the time of withdrawal of Maintenance Petition No.352/2020 and Execution Petitions. 5.
It is further stated that the remaining third installment of Rs.2,000,000/- has also been paid by the petitioner No. 1/husband at the time of quashing of FIR No. 10/2021. It is also stated that the child shall remain in the custody of Respondent No. 2/wife and the Petitioner No.1/husband shall have no visitation rights. 6.
It is also stated that on 15.02.2023, the marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 had been dissolved as per Hindu law. 7.
In view of the Compromise Deed dated 04.01.2024, the present Petition has been filed.
8.
The parties are present before this Court in-person today, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer concerned. The parties have endorsed the amicable settlement and accepted the terms thereof voluntarily.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
9.
The third installment of Rs.2,00,000/- has been paid to the respondent No. 2/wife by the petitioner No. 1, and the same has been confirmed by the respondent No. 2/wife.
10.
The parties have submitted that all the disputes have been amicably settled vide Compromise Deed dated 04.01.2024 and thus, no fruitful purpose will be served in continuing with the FIR. 11.
The present petition has been signed by all the parties and is supported by their respective affidavits. The parties have reaffirmed the terms of the settlement arrived at vide Compromise Deed dated 04.01.2024 and they also submit that the said Compromise Deed has been arrived at between the parties without any pressure and coercion. 12.
Today, the complainant/respondent No. 2/wife, who is present in Court, states that she has received all amounts due to her and has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
13.
In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion and also the fact that the present matter is a family matter, I am of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
14.
Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.
15.
Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 10/2021 registered at Police Station Ghazipur, for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
are quashed. It is hereby made clear that the above Settlement is without prejudice to the rights of the child.
16.
The petition stands disposed of.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J MAY 27, 2025 va The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.