← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/1553/2025

Arnav Bhayana & ORS. v. State N.Ct Of Delhi And ANR

2025-07-07Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula2 pages

$~99 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1553/2025 & CRL.M.A. 14478/2025 ARNAV BHAYANA & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr.

Sumit Saini, Advocate with Petitioners.

versus STATE N.CT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC (Crl.) with Mr.

Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Kr, Arya and Mr.

Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates for State.

ASI Naveen Kumar, P.S. Saket.

Mr. Prakhar Srivastava, Advocate for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 07.07.2025 1.

The instant petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No. 0260/2024 under Sections 323, 341 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 18601 registered at P.S. Saket, on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the parties.

The petition is accompanied with a Memorandum of Understanding/Settlement Agreement dated 1st May, 20252 executed between the partis, as well as an affidavit of the Complainant - i.e., Respondent No. 2 recording the settlement terms, receiving his no objection to the quashing of the FIR.

1 "IPC"

2 "MoU"

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2025 at 11:47:30

2.

However, at the outset counsel for Petitioners states that since Respondent No. 2 is not agreeable to the terms of the settlement mentioned in the MoU, he has instructions to withdraw the present petition. 3.

At the same time, counsel representing Respondent No. 2, states that he seeks discharge from representing Respondent No. 2. 4.

Apparently the settlement arrived at between the parties has not fructified. In any event, since the Petitioners have now decided to withdraw the present petition, the prayer for withdrawal is allowed. 5.

Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of as infructuous. 6.

It is clarified that the Court has not commented on the merits of the case. In the event, the parties arrived at a genuine settlement in the future, they shall be free to re-apply to the Court for appropriate orders by filing an appropriate petition, in accordance with law. SANJEEV NARULA, J JULY 7, 2025 as The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2025 at 11:47:30