Ricky Kundra v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi
i- $~39«fe40 •- *
IN THE HIGH GOURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAILAPPLN.265/2018; . > ^ . \ ;/ • PRAMTAKUNDRA ^ , . - ; . '
.
, • , .
, .....Petitioner;
Represented by:
Mr. D.K. Ahuja, Adv.
• ,'
. versus • , THE STATE(ipVTOF NGT OF DELHI !
.
, :
- '
'
' , '
'
. -"...Respondent ^ .
Represented by: ; Ms. MeenaksHiChauhan, APP • ^ '
with SI Rajesh Kumar PS Kotla ..
Mubarak Pur, . , - ' - BAIL:^PLN!272/2018. ,/ "
' ^ rfRICKYKUNDRA , '
Petitioner ;
Represented by:
versus , THE STATE GOVT OF NGT OF DELHI Respondent , Represented by:
'
'GORAM:". ' y , V,;
'
HON'BLE MS. JUSTIGE MUKTA
ORDER
% 02.02.2018 Crl.M.A. 2024/2018 in BAIL APPLN. 265/2018 , Crl.M.A. 2053/2018 in BAIL APPLN. 272/2018 BAIL APPLNs. 265/2018 & 272/2018 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
-BAIL APPLN. 265/2018 and BAIL APPLN. 272/2018 This is the third anticipatorybail applicationfiled by the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the change in circumstance is the statusreportdated27^^ November,2017 of SHO PS KotlaMubarakPur. The status report dated 27'*^ November,2017 was duly consideredby this Court while passingthe order dated 29^^ November,2017 where after the anticipatory bail appHcations were dismissed. This cannot be the new circumstance.
' Petitions are accordingly dismissed.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
FEBRUARY 02, 2018 'ga'
BAILAPPLNs. 265/2018iSc 272/2018