← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./3343/2019

Karan Mogha @ Karan Monga & ORS. v. The State (NCT Of Delhi ) & ANR.

2019-11-18Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait2 pages

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 18.11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 3343/2019 KARAN MOGHA @ KARAN MONGA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Sanjay Singh, Adv. with petitioners in person versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR.

..... Respondents Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State W/SI Renu, PS Delhi Cantt.

Ms. Richa, Complainant/ R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1.

Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.504/2015 dated 16.09.2015 registered at Police Station Delhi Cantt and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2.

Notice issued.

3.

Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. 4.

The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 19.11.2010 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born out of the wedlock namely CRL.M.C.3343/2019

'Anurag' on 27.09.2011. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately since 21.10.2014.

5.

The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement and have been granted a decree of divorce by the Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka vide order dated 04.05.2019.

6.

The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by W/SI Renu, PS Delhi Cantt. and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further. 5.

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

6.

For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.504/2015 dated 16.09.2015 registered at Police Station Delhi Cantt and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

7.

The petition is allowed accordingly.

8.

Order dasti.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE NOVEMBER 18, 2019/sm CRL.M.C.3343/2019