Ziya Ur Rehman v. The State NCT Of Delhi And ANR
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ZIYA UR REHMAN .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Ziaul Haq, Advocate along with Petitioner in person.
versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through:
Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC for the State with Mr. Amit Peswani, Advocate.
Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Mr. Vijayant Kumar, Mr. Manoj Kumar, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh, Mr. Sashindra Kumar, Ms.
Aakriti Gupta, Mr. Gautam Arya and Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for R-2 along with Respondent No.2 in person.
SI Nandan Singh, PS Gokul Puri.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 05.07.2024 1.
The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) has been filed for quashing FIR No.146/2013 dated 19.04.2013, registered at Police Station Gokal puri, Delhi for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 406 and 34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The present FIR is the outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the parties.
2.
It is stated that the parties have resolved their disputes by way of a Settlement Agreement dated 06.04.2024. It is stated by Respondent No.2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
that she does not have any objection if the present FIR against the Petitioner is quashed. As per the Settlement Agreement dated 06.04.2024, the Petitioner has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.11,50,000/- to the Respondent No.2 towards full and final settlement of all her claims in the following manner: a) A sum of Rs.4,00,000/- was to be paid on the date of releasing order by Hon'ble Court from civil imprisonment. b) A sum of Rs.3,50,000/- was to be paid on the third pronouncement of talaq to Respondent No.2.
c) A sum of Rs.4,00,000/- was to be paid at the time of quashing of the FIR.
3.
Today, the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2 are present in Court. The complainant/Respondent No.2 has been identified by her Counsel and the Investigating Officer SI Nandan Singh, PS Gokul Puri. The complainant/Respondent No.2 states that she has received the entire amount and settled all her disputes with the Petitioner out of her own free will, without pressure, coercion or undue influence. The parties undertake that they will remain bound by the terms of the settlement arrived at between them before the Family Court and the proceedings recorded before this Court 4.
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the present proceedings. Resultantly, the FIR No.146/2013 dated 19.04.2013, registered at Police Station Gokal puri, Delhi for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 406 and 34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and the proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
5.
The petition stands disposed of in the above terms, along with pending(s), if any.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J JULY 05, 2024 S. Zakir The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.